Embraer Phenom 100EV vs Cessna Citation CJ3+
The Matchup
The Phenom 100EV is the gateway jet — the most affordable entry into jet ownership. The CJ3+ is the step up — more range, more speed, and more cabin. Both target owner-operators and first-time jet buyers. The question is whether to start small and save money, or stretch for the more capable aircraft from day one.
Head to Head
| Embraer Phenom 100EV | Spec | Cessna Citation CJ3+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1,178 NM at Mach 0.64 | Range | ★2,040 NM at Mach 0.67 |
862 NM more range. This is the defining difference. The CJ3+ covers coast-to-coast US and most continental European routes. The Phenom 100EV is limited to regional missions under 1,200 NM. | ||
| Mach 0.70 | Max Speed | ★Mach 0.72 |
Marginally faster. Neither is a speed demon — both are entry-level performers. | ||
| 5 ft 1 in★ | Cabin Width | 4 ft 10 in |
Three inches wider. The Phenom has a more generous cross-section despite being the smaller aircraft. | ||
| 11 ft 0 in | Cabin Length | ★15 ft 8 in |
Nearly 5 feet longer. The CJ3+ accommodates 6–7 passengers comfortably; the Phenom 100EV is genuinely comfortable for only 4. | ||
| 4 ft 11 in★ | Cabin Height | 4 ft 8 in |
Three inches taller. Minor, but adds to the Phenom's wider-feeling cabin. | ||
| 4–7 | Passengers | ★6–9 |
More usable passenger capacity. | ||
| 41,000 ft | Ceiling | ★45,000 ft |
4,000 feet higher. The CJ3+ cruises above more weather and traffic. | ||
| 3,190 ft | Takeoff Distance | 3,180 ft |
| 2,473 ft★ | Landing Distance | 2,770 ft |
297 feet shorter. The Phenom accesses slightly shorter runways. | ||
| 2× Pratt & Whitney Canada PW617F1-E (1,695 lbs each) | Engines | ★2× Williams FJ44-3A (2,820 lbs each) |
66% more thrust per engine. The CJ3+ has significantly more power. | ||
| $4.65M–$4.995M asking (October 2026) | 2026 Acquisition Market Reference | $5.93M–$10.29M Vref (July 2026) |
Market research reviewed October 8, 2026: Embraer Phenom 100EV: $4.65M–$4.995M asking (October 2026); Cessna Citation CJ3+: $5.93M–$10.29M Vref (July 2026). These retain their different source dates and measurement bases. Public asking examples, model-wide valuations and production positions are not interchangeable achieved sale prices. Sources: https://www.globalair.com/aircraft-for-sale/phenom-100ev | https://www.duncanaviation.aero/files/aircraft-sales/Business-Jet-Model-Market-Summary-Metric.pdf | ||
862 NM more range. This is the defining difference. The CJ3+ covers coast-to-coast US and most continental European routes. The Phenom 100EV is limited to regional missions under 1,200 NM.
Marginally faster. Neither is a speed demon — both are entry-level performers.
Three inches wider. The Phenom has a more generous cross-section despite being the smaller aircraft.
Nearly 5 feet longer. The CJ3+ accommodates 6–7 passengers comfortably; the Phenom 100EV is genuinely comfortable for only 4.
Three inches taller. Minor, but adds to the Phenom's wider-feeling cabin.
More usable passenger capacity.
4,000 feet higher. The CJ3+ cruises above more weather and traffic.
297 feet shorter. The Phenom accesses slightly shorter runways.
66% more thrust per engine. The CJ3+ has significantly more power.
Market research reviewed October 8, 2026: Embraer Phenom 100EV: $4.65M–$4.995M asking (October 2026); Cessna Citation CJ3+: $5.93M–$10.29M Vref (July 2026). These retain their different source dates and measurement bases. Public asking examples, model-wide valuations and production positions are not interchangeable achieved sale prices. Sources: https://www.globalair.com/aircraft-for-sale/phenom-100ev | https://www.duncanaviation.aero/files/aircraft-sales/Business-Jet-Model-Market-Summary-Metric.pdf
Cost Comparison
Market research reviewed October 8, 2026: Embraer Phenom 100EV: $4.65M–$4.995M asking (October 2026); Cessna Citation CJ3+: $5.93M–$10.29M Vref (July 2026). These retain their different source dates and measurement bases. Public asking examples, model-wide valuations and production positions are not interchangeable achieved sale prices. Sources: https://www.globalair.com/aircraft-for-sale/phenom-100ev | https://www.duncanaviation.aero/files/aircraft-sales/Business-Jet-Model-Market-Summary-Metric.pdf Operating-cost figures remain historical planning estimates. Compare both aircraft using the same annual hours, fuel price, crew basis, reserves and exclusions.
Model these costs with your own hours, fuel price, and crew.
Open Cost Comparison Tool →Which One Wins?
Compare current aircraft offers
Market research reviewed October 8, 2026: Embraer Phenom 100EV: $4.65M–$4.995M asking (October 2026); Cessna Citation CJ3+: $5.93M–$10.29M Vref (July 2026). These retain their different source dates and measurement bases. Public asking examples, model-wide valuations and production positions are not interchangeable achieved sale prices. Aircraft age, condition and maintenance commitments can outweigh an apparent model-level price advantage.
CJ3+
862 NM more range transforms the aircraft's utility. The CJ3+ covers coast-to-coast missions that the Phenom 100EV simply can't reach. If you need to go further than 1,200 NM regularly, the CJ3+ is the only choice.
Phenom 100EV
Three inches wider. The Phenom feels more spacious despite being the smaller aircraft. For 2–4 passengers on short flights, the cabin experience is pleasant.
CJ3+
The CJ3+ covers more missions as your needs evolve. The Phenom 100EV's 1,178 NM range may become limiting quickly if your business or travel patterns expand.
Depends on your mission
If most flights are under 1,000 NM with 2–4 passengers, the Phenom 100EV is the right entry point. If you need continental range from day one, start with the CJ3+.
The Final Take
These are different categories of aircraft masquerading as competitors. The CJ3+ is a capable light jet that covers most continental missions. The Phenom 100EV is an entry-level jet limited to regional flights. The 862 NM range gap defines the comparison. If your missions are primarily short hops — 500 to 1,000 NM, 2–4 passengers — the Phenom 100EV delivers genuine jet capability at the lowest possible cost. It's the perfect stepping stone from turboprop to jet, and its operating costs are barely above a high-end King Air. The honest advice for first-time buyers: if you can afford the CJ3+, buy it. You'll likely outgrow the Phenom 100EV's range within a year or two. The CJ3+ covers your missions today and tomorrow. Market research reviewed October 8, 2026: Embraer Phenom 100EV: $4.65M–$4.995M asking (October 2026); Cessna Citation CJ3+: $5.93M–$10.29M Vref (July 2026). These retain their different source dates and measurement bases. Public asking examples, model-wide valuations and production positions are not interchangeable achieved sale prices. Compare aircraft of similar vintage and maintenance position before inferring a model premium.
Read the Full Guides
Frequently Asked Questions
If you need the range — absolutely. 2,040 NM vs 1,178 NM is a fundamentally different capability. If your flights are all under 1,000 NM, the Phenom 100EV does the job for less.
If budget is the primary constraint, the Phenom 100EV gets you into jet ownership. If you can stretch to the CJ3+, it's the more capable and future-proof choice.
No. 1,178 NM range is insufficient for US coast-to-coast. A fuel stop is required. The CJ3+ covers most coast-to-coast routes nonstop.
The Phenom 100EV — 5'1" vs 4'10". Three inches wider despite being the smaller aircraft.
Market research reviewed October 8, 2026: Embraer Phenom 100EV: $4.65M–$4.995M asking (October 2026); Cessna Citation CJ3+: $5.93M–$10.29M Vref (July 2026). These retain their different source dates and measurement bases. Public asking examples, model-wide valuations and production positions are not interchangeable achieved sale prices. The sample does not establish a fixed premium or faster resale for every aircraft.
Yes — both are designed and commonly operated with a single pilot.
Need help deciding?
No pitch, no pressure. Just twenty years of experience and a straightforward conversation about what fits your mission.
Let's TalkLast updated: 2026-10-08