Ultra-Long-Range•Comparison

Gulfstream G800 vs Bombardier Global 7500

Overview

The Matchup

The G800 emphasizes range; the Global 7500 offers a longer cabin. The G800 entered service in August 2025 and publishes 8,200 NM at Mach 0.85, compared with the Global 7500’s published 7,700 NM. Those 500 NM are useful only if they address a recurring mission with adequate operating margins.

Specifications

Head to Head

Range
Gulfstream G8008,200 NM at Mach 0.85 ★
vs
Bombardier Global 75007,700 NM at Mach 0.85

Manufacturer specification reviewed October 2026. Performance figures use published test conditions; actual runway and mission planning require aircraft flight-manual calculations.

Max Speed
Gulfstream G800Mach 0.935 ★
vs
Bombardier Global 7500Mach 0.925

Manufacturer specification reviewed October 2026. Performance figures use published test conditions; actual runway and mission planning require aircraft flight-manual calculations.

Cabin Width
Gulfstream G8008 ft 2 in ★
vs
Bombardier Global 75008 ft 0 in

Two inches wider. A minor advantage.

Cabin Length
Gulfstream G80046 ft 10 in
vs
Bombardier Global 750054 ft 7 in ★

Nearly 8 feet longer. This is the Global's decisive advantage. The G800 shares the G650's cabin dimensions — excellent for three zones. The Global's four-zone layout with a dedicated master suite, conference area, and entertainment zone simply offers more living space.

Cabin Height
Gulfstream G8006 ft 3 in ★
vs
Bombardier Global 75006 ft 2 in
Passengers
Gulfstream G8008–19
vs
Bombardier Global 750014–19 ★

The Global's longer cabin makes higher passenger counts genuinely comfortable. The G800 seats the same maximum but gets crowded faster.

Ceiling
Gulfstream G80051,000 ft
vs
Bombardier Global 750051,000 ft
Takeoff Distance
Gulfstream G8005,812 ft (SL, ISA, MTOW)
vs
Bombardier Global 75005,750 ft ★

Manufacturer specification reviewed October 2026. Performance figures use published test conditions; actual runway and mission planning require aircraft flight-manual calculations.

Landing Distance
Gulfstream G8003,105 ft (SL, ISA)
vs
Bombardier Global 75002,635 ft ★

Manufacturer specification reviewed October 2026. Performance figures use published test conditions; actual runway and mission planning require aircraft flight-manual calculations.

Engines
Gulfstream G8002× Rolls-Royce Pearl 700 (18,250 lbs each)
vs
Bombardier Global 75002× GE Passport (18,920 lbs each)

Both are excellent modern engines. The Pearl 700 powers the G800's extended range through superior fuel efficiency. The GE Passport has more raw thrust.

2026 Acquisition Market Reference
Gulfstream G800$72.5M–$76.5M Vref (July 2026)
vs
Bombardier Global 7500$59.995M asking — 2018 SN 70006

Market research reviewed October 8, 2026: Gulfstream G800: $72.5M–$76.5M Vref (July 2026); Bombardier Global 7500: $59.995M asking — 2018 SN 70006. These retain their different source dates and measurement bases. Public asking examples, model-wide valuations and production positions are not interchangeable achieved sale prices. Sources: https://www.duncanaviation.aero/files/aircraft-sales/Business-Jet-Model-Market-Summary-Metric.pdf | https://www.globalair.com/aircraft-for-sale/global-7500

Ownership

Cost Comparison

Variable Cost / Hour
Gulfstream G800~$3,585/hr
Bombardier Global 7500~$3,530/hr
Annual Fixed Costs
Gulfstream G800~$1.5M/yr
Bombardier Global 7500~$1.5M/yr
Total Annual Cost
Gulfstream G800~$2.9M–$3.4M
Bombardier Global 7500~$2.9M–$3.3M

Market research reviewed October 8, 2026: Gulfstream G800: $72.5M–$76.5M Vref (July 2026); Bombardier Global 7500: $59.995M asking — 2018 SN 70006. These retain their different source dates and measurement bases. Public asking examples, model-wide valuations and production positions are not interchangeable achieved sale prices. Sources: https://www.duncanaviation.aero/files/aircraft-sales/Business-Jet-Model-Market-Summary-Metric.pdf | https://www.globalair.com/aircraft-for-sale/global-7500 Operating-cost figures remain historical planning estimates. Compare both aircraft using the same annual hours, fuel price, crew basis, reserves and exclusions.

Model these costs with your own hours, fuel price, and crew.

Open Cost Comparison Tool →
Verdict

Which One Wins?

Recurring missions near the range limit

Gulfstream G800

Consider the 500 NM published range advantage after accounting for payload, winds, reserves and actual aircraft configuration.

Long flights needing more cabin separation

Bombardier Global 7500

Compare its longer cabin against the actual G800 layout; acquisition choice also depends on available aircraft and current prices.

Bottom Line

The Final Take

Choose the G800 when its additional published range solves frequent missions and its cabin layout fits the passenger group. Choose the Global 7500 when the longer four-zone cabin better supports the operation. The theoretical range gap is 500 NM, not a guarantee of a particular route. Compare flight-manual runway calculations, payload and wind cases, verified aircraft availability, and current acquisition offers. Historical cost estimates and advertised prices do not establish an operating-cost or purchase-price winner.

Deep Dive

Read the Full Guides

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Published long-range cruise range is 8,200 NM for the G800 and 7,700 NM for the Global 7500, a 500 NM difference. Both figures are theoretical and require mission-specific planning.

Identify current aircraft and factory positions with the manufacturer or broker. G800 deliveries began in August 2025. Neither a delivery date nor a mature-model inventory assumption establishes current availability.

Advisory

Need help deciding?

No pitch, no pressure. Just twenty years of experience and a straightforward conversation about what fits your mission.

Let's Talk

Last updated: 2026-10-08